Carbon Processing & Reclamation, LLC v. Valero Marketing & Supply Co.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT
S. THOMAS ANDERSON, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (D.E.# 28) filed on July 2, 2009. Plaintiffs responded in opposition, and Defendants have filed a reply brief. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint asserted six causes of action against Defendants: fraud in the inducement (Count I), fraud/promissory fraud (Count II), promissory estoppel and equitable…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- EPAC Technologies, Inc. v. HarperCollins ChristianCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Harding v. BMW of North America, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020
- Hinman v. ValleyCrest Landscaping Development, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020
- Mini Systems, Inc. v. Marvin AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2020
- Tennessee Extracts, LLC v. TGC Systems, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.