Legal Opinion

Hall v. Carlsbad Supermarket/IGA

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 2007No. 26,538PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VIGIL, Judge.

{1} This case presents an issue of first impression under the Workers’ Compensation Act (the Act), NMSA 1978, §§ 52-1-1 to -70 (1929, as amended through 2007): Does a doctor who performs an independent medical examination (IME) under Section 52-1-51, pursuant to the parties’ agreement, exceed the scope of his authority when he diagnoses injuries not specifically identified in the agreement and concludes they were caused by the on-the-job accident? We hold that the doctor did not exceed the scope of the IME and that the worker’s compensation judge (WCJ) did not err by…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lone Star Cement Corporation v. FairTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Breen v. Carlsbad Municipal SchoolsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Wagner v. AGW CONSULTANTSNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Archer v. Roadrunner Trucking, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Register v. Roberson Const. Co., Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jones v. Holiday Inn ExpressNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Gutierrez v. Intel Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Dell Catalog Sales L.P. v. Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Catherine C. Finn v. Sean D. TullockNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. Brashar v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API