Legal Opinion

Brashar v. Regents of the University of California

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 18, 2014No. 34,699; Docket No. 32,246PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VIGIL, Judge.

{1} Lynda Brashar (Worker) filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits, alleging she suffered from heavy metal toxicity due to toxic exposure she experienced in her employ as a chemistry technician at the Los Alamos National Laboratories (Employer). The workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) denied her claim. Worker appeals, arguing, among other things, that the WCJ erred in admitting the testimony of Dr. Don Fisher, the only expert testimony supporting no workplace causation. Worker contends that Dr. Fisher’s testimony was inadmissable because he was neither her treating…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dewitt v. Rent-A-Center, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Grine v. Peabody Natural ResourcesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Jurado v. Levi Strauss & Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Aragon v. Furr's, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Hall v. Carlsbad Supermarket/IGANew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brashar v. Univ. of Calif. RegentsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API