Legal Opinion

Washington Ass'n v. Middleton

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 5, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a rule to show cause why a mandamus should not issue commanding the treasurer and comptroller of the state to pay to the relator the sum of $2,500 alleged to be due on April 1st, 1932.

A sufficient statement of the facts for present purposes is as follows:

In 1874, by Pamph. L. 1874, p. 1147, the relator was incorporated, and by section 7 of that act it was provided:

“7. And be it enacted, that so long as the building known as the Washington headquarters shall be open to the public free of charge, at all proper times; and so long as it shall be held as an historical building, within…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Mooney v. EdwardsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1889
  2. Edward C. Jones Co. v. Town of GuttenbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
  3. McAllister v. Atlantic CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Camden v. ByrneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  2. Steele v. Locke Cotton Mills Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Smith v. GoldmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  4. City of Camden v. ByrneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API