Legal Opinion
Washington Ass'n v. Middleton
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided April 5, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
This is a rule to show cause why a mandamus should not issue commanding the treasurer and comptroller of the state to pay to the relator the sum of $2,500 alleged to be due on April 1st, 1932.
A sufficient statement of the facts for present purposes is as follows:
In 1874, by Pamph. L. 1874, p. 1147, the relator was incorporated, and by section 7 of that act it was provided:
“7. And be it enacted, that so long as the building known as the Washington headquarters shall be open to the public free of charge, at all proper times; and so long as it shall be held as an historical building, within…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Mooney v. EdwardsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1889
- Edward C. Jones Co. v. Town of GuttenbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
- McAllister v. Atlantic CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1917
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Camden v. ByrneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Steele v. Locke Cotton Mills Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Smith v. GoldmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- City of Camden v. ByrneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980