Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Mooney v. Edwards

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1889PublishedCited by 11 opinions

0-n rule to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Garrison, J.

A mandamus is applied for in this case to be directed to a justice of the peace who presided at a trial between the parties hereto in the court for the trial of small causes, to compel him to alter his docket entry as to the date .at which an appeal bond had been filed.

*480By section 137 of the Justices’ Court act (Rev., p. 564), it is provided that, from any judgment which may be obtained before a justice of the peace, an appeal may be granted by the filing of an appeal bond, &c., provided, that where the judgment was rendered on the verdict…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boston Turnpike Co. v. Town of PomfretSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1850
  2. Smith v. MooreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
  3. Finley v. AikenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1855

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. DeHart v. BambrickNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  2. Connolly v. WoodsIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Richard Caporusso v. New Jersey Department of Health and Senior ServicesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
  4. New Gold Equities Corp. v. Jaffe Spindler Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
  5. NJ Optometric Ass'n v. Hillman-Kohan Eyeglasses, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API