Legal Opinion
Zephyr v. Ortho McNeil Pharmaceutical
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided July 29, 1999No. 3:97cv2702 (AHN)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
NEVAS, District Judge.
The plaintiff, J. Alix Zephyr (“Zephyr”), brings this action against the defendants, Ortho McNeil Pharmaceutical (“OMP”) and M. Machan Littleton (“Littleton”), alleging race discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (“Title VII”), the Connecticut Fair Employment Practices Act, Conn. Gen.Stat. § 46a-60 (“CFEPA”), and the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (“ § 1981”).
Now pending before the Court is the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons that…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Edwards v. Acadia Realty Trust, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2001
- Bryant v. Greater New Haven Transit DistrictDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Duffy v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2006
- Gadbois v. Cumberland Farms, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
- Gray v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.