Legal Opinion
Gray v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided April 30, 2024No. 3:23-cv-01069Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT --------------------------------------------------------------- x CATHERINE GRAY, : : Plaintiff, : : MEMORANDUM & -against- : ORDER GRANTING : DEFENDANT’S MOTION MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING : TO DISMISS COMPANY, : : 3:23-CV-01069 (VDO) Defendant. : --------------------------------------------------------------- x VERNON D. OLIVER, United States District Judge: The plaintiff Catherine Gray has brought this action alleging that the defendant Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (“Defendant” or “3M”) retaliated and discriminated…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Vega v. Hempstead Union Free School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Hicks v. BainesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.