Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. Rabuchin

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1944No. Civ. No. 14387PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

—This is an appeal by defendants from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, after trial before the court without a jury, in an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff, Judith Arlene Goldberg, a minor, as a result of having been bitten by two dogs which belonged to defendants.

The evidence being viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiffs (respondents), the essential facts are:

On May 5, 1943, while crossing the intersection of Livonia and Pickford Streets, public highways in Los Angeles, two dogs owned by defendants attacked Judith Arlene Goldberg, a minor nine…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Martinelli v. LuisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Crenshaw v. Roy C. Seeley Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. DeLay v. BraunCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Shreve & Co. v. McGinnisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Lundy v. California RealtyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Buffington v. NicholsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Johnson v. McMahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Sandstrom v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API