Legal Opinion

Sandstrom v. California Horse Racing Board

California Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1948No. L. A. 20332Published

1Opinion of the Court

31 Cal.2d 401 (1948)

W. L. SANDSTROM, Respondent,

v.

CALIFORNIA HORSE RACING BOARD et al., Appellants.

L. A. No. 20332.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Feb. 3, 1948.

Fred N. Howser, Attorney General, and Walter L. Bowers, Assistant Attorney General, for Appellants.

Joseph Scott, J. Howard Ziemann and Cuthbert J. Scott for Respondent.

SHENK, J.

The California Horse Racing Board appeals from a judgment in a mandamus proceeding the effect of which is to cancel its order suspending a trainer's license for six months. The judgment was entered upon the failure of the board to answer after its demurrer…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad v. TurnipseedSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Heiner v. DonnanSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Morrison v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API