Legal Opinion
Brookings Lumber & Box Co. v. Manufacturers' Automatic Sprinkler Co.
California Supreme Court
Decided November 23, 1916No. L. A. No. 3793PublishedCited by 2 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
• MELVIN,
We will treat this as an appeal from the judgment and from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, although respondents contend that no efficient appeal was made from the order, owing to the failure of plaintiff to serve them with proper notice.
Plaintiff entered into a written contract on July 7, 1910, with the Manufacturers’ Automatic Sprinkler Company, whereby the latter agreed for a certain consideration to install in the former’s box factory an improved “wet-pipe” system of automatic sprinklers and fire-extinguishing apparatus. On September 22, 1910, and while the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hunt Bros. Co. v. San Lorenzo Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Standard Box Co. v. Mutual Biscuit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- Peterson v. ChaixCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Belden v. Union Central Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Schaeffer Piano Mfg. Co. v. National Fire Extinguisher Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1906
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wilkinson & Co. v. McKinleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Brown v. LambCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927