Legal Opinion

Haber v. Chrysler Corp.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 20, 1997No. 6-CV-74608-DTPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND AND ORDER REMANDING CASE TO WAYNE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

ROSEN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Thomas Haber instituted this wrongful discharge action on November 20, 1995 in the Wayne County Circuit Court. Defendant Chrysler Corporation answered Plaintiffs complaint in January 1996. The action proceeded in- the state court through discovery, and on August 6, 1996, Chrysler filed a motion for summary disposition to which motion, Plaintiff responded a month later, on September 12,1996.

Chrysler contends that in Plaintiffs Response to…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Graham A. Peters v. The Lincoln Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  2. Marshall Huffman Virginia Newton v. Saul Holdings Limited Partnership, a Maryland Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  3. Casumpang v. ILWU, LOCAL 142Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  4. McPhatter v. SweitzerDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2005
  5. Mill-Bern Associates, Inc. v. Dallas Semiconductor Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API