Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Ford

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided September 2, 2010No. 20090542-CAPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIS, Presiding Judge:

T1 Plaintiff Tom Watkins appeals the Judgment of the trial court resolving his contractual dispute with Defendant Henry Day Ford (Henry Day). Watkins argues that the trial court erred in several respects in its decision. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

BACKGROUND

T2 At the North American Auto Show in January 2002, Ford Motor Company (Ford) unveiled a GT4O0 concept car, which was designed to resemble the legendary race car of the same name that had achieved great success in the 1960s. When the concept car received an extremely positive reception at *529the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Daines v. VincentUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Jeffs v. StubbsUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Ward v. Intermountain Farmers Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Mahmood v. RossUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Soter's, Inc. v. Deseret Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Watkins v. FordUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Tech Center 2000, LLC v. ZRII, LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  3. Goldenwest Federal Credit Union v. KenworthyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
  4. Watkins v. FordUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Watkins v. FordUtah Supreme Court · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API