Jordan v. Jordan
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KEETON, Justice.
This action was instituted by Carl H. Jordan as plaintiff, respondent here, to secure a divorce from Amelia C. Jordan, appellant here.
Respondent based his cause of action on the provisions of Section 32-610, I.C. which provides: “When married persons have heretofore lived or shall hereafter live separate and apart for a period of five years or more without cohabitation, either party to the marriage contract may sue for a divorce which shall be granted on proof of the continuous living separate and apart without cohabitation of the spouses during said period of five years or…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Young v. . YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- McClure v. McClureSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Dale v. DaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- McDaniel v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
- Gates v. GatesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lillis v. LillisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Sinha v. SinhaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Veach v. VeachIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
- Finnegan v. FinneganIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
- Adams v. AdamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.