Legal Opinion

Jordan v. Jordan

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1949No. 7550PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEETON, Justice.

This action was instituted by Carl H. Jordan as plaintiff, respondent here, to secure a divorce from Amelia C. Jordan, appellant here.

Respondent based his cause of action on the provisions of Section 32-610, I.C. which provides: “When married persons have heretofore lived or shall hereafter live separate and apart for a period of five years or more without cohabitation, either party to the marriage contract may sue for a divorce which shall be granted on proof of the continuous living separate and apart without cohabitation of the spouses during said period of five years or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Young v. . YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. McClure v. McClureSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  3. Dale v. DaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. McDaniel v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  5. Gates v. GatesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lillis v. LillisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  2. Sinha v. SinhaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Veach v. VeachIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Finnegan v. FinneganIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Adams v. AdamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API