Legal Opinion

Finnegan v. Finnegan

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1955No. 8243PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Justice.

The trial court granted respondent (the husband) a divorce upon the ground that the parties have lived separate and apart for more than five years without cohabitation. Sec. 32-610, I.C.

The parties to this action were married February 12, 1938, in Canton, Illinois, by reason of necessity. They engaged in farming near Princeton, Illinois, following their marriage, which was unhappy due to constant quarrels and bickering, each party blaming the other, it being admitted that he was addicted to the use of narcotics and he claiming she instituted quarrels relative to money…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brashear v. BrashearIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Howay v. HowayIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Ackel v. AckelArizona Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Brown v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Grimditch v. GrimditchArizona Supreme Court · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Embree v. EmbreeIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Matysek v. MatysekCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Losee v. LoseeIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Canavos v. CanavosSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
  5. Wilson v. Employment Security CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API