Cannon v. Castleman
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Marshall Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
The appellant has presented the question as to the sufficiency on demurrer of each of the three paragraphs of the appellee’s complaint.
In the first paragraph it was alleged that the appellant “is indebted to plaintiff in the sum of $500 for commission due to plaintiff for the sale of 520 acres of land for defendant, at his [defendant’s] special instance and request; that said sum is justly due and wholly unpaid. Wherefore plaintiff prays judgment for $600; that said commission is reasonably worth $500.”
*189In the second paragraph of complaint it was shown that on or about May 3, 1895, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wagoner v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Wolf v. SchofieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Parker v. HubbleIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- McCoy v. OldhamIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
- Peden v. MailIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Miller v. StevensIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
- Smith v. BiesiadaIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
- McCaslin v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
- Daly v. GubbinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
- Montgomery v. EmpeyWyoming Supreme Court · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.