Harsha v. Maremont Corp.

OPALA, Vice Chief Justice.

The dispositive issues on certiorari are: (1) Is the trial tribunal’s decision against the physician so legally flawed that the claim must be remanded for reconsideration? and (2) Did the Court of Appeals err in assessing the physician’s counsel fees and costs against the employer? We answer both questions in the affirmative.

William N. Harsha, M.D. [physician or medical claimant] sought to recover pay*1072ment from Maremont Corporation [employer] for medical services claimed to have been rendered to an injured employee. At the hearing the medical claimant’s lawyer offered…