Wilson v. Glancy
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion
ORDER ON REHEARING AND SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION ON MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS
SUMMERS, Justice.
Appellee Clancy’s petition for rehearing is denied. Appellant Wilson seeks appeal-related attorney’s fees and costs, and we address that request.1
I
Appellant seeks an attorney’s fee under several statutes. First he cites 20 O.S.1991 § 15.1. This statute authorizes an attorney’s fee when the appeal is “without merit.” It has no applicability to this case. Harsha v. Maremont Corp., 784 P.2d 1070, 1074 (Okla. 1989). Wilson himself was the appellant.
Next, Appellant relies upon 12 O.S.1991 § 936.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Willis v. Nowata Land and Cattle Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. NewSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- First Community Bank of Blanchard v. HodgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Sunrizon Homes, Inc. v. American Guaranty Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.