Legal Opinion
Hedrick v. Hardt
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided March 13, 2015No. 111,273PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
WM. C. HETHERINGTON, JR., Chief. Judge. n .
T1 In this medical negligence action, Appellant Melese Hedrick (Plaintiff) appeals the denial 'of her -motion for new trial and the judgment based on a jury's verdict in favor of Appellees Joan M. Hardt, M.D., and Reju-vena Skin and Wellness Center, a Profession al Corporation, a/k/a Rejuvena Clinic, P.C. (collectively; - Defendants). The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court correctly refused to instruct the jury on res ipsa logui-tur. We find no error and affirm.
FACTS
T2 In 2001, Plaintiff received hair removal treatments on her face at…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Woodall v. Chandler Material Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- St. John's Hospital & School of Nursing, Inc. v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Harder v. F.C. Clinton, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Lierly v. Tidewater Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Smith v. HinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Phyllis Mack v. Schindler Elevator CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2026