Legal Opinion
Phyllis Mack v. Schindler Elevator Corporation
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided April 6, 2026No. 4:23-cv-00246Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA PHYLLIS MACK, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 23-CV-00246-SEH-JFJ SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Defendant Schindler Elevator Corporation’s (“Schindler”) motion for summary judgment. [ECF No. 37]. Plaintiff Phyllis Mack brings a single claim of negligence against Schindler. [ECF No. 1]. Mack alleges she was injured when a mesh elevator door on a large freight elevator closed upon her. [Id. at ¶ 4]. She further alleges that Schindler “negligently manufactured and/or maintained”…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Tolan v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Thomas v. Wichita Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.