Legal Opinion

Henry Ex Rel. Henry v. Raynor Manufacturing Co.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided November 21, 1990No. 3-90 CIV 226PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ALSOP, Chief Judge.

The above entitled matter came before the court on defendant Raynor Manufacturing Company’s, Jim Walter Corporation’s, and Wayne-Dalton Corporation’s motions for summary judgment on November 9, 1990, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(b).

I. STANDARD OF REVIEW

The Supreme Court has held that summary judgment is to be used as a tool to isolate and dispose of claims or defenses which are either factually unsupported or which are based on undisputed facts. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323-324, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552-2553, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); Hegg v.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Marriage of Nardini v. NardiniSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Burroughs v. Precision Airmotive Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. Thunanber v. Uponor, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
  3. Appletree Square 1 Ltd. Partnership v. W.R. Grace & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
  4. Helleloid v. Independent School District No. 361District Court, D. Minnesota · 2001
  5. Lamere v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API