Legal Opinion

Eason v. Barber

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 15, 1988No. 8727SC727PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Under their first assignment of error plaintiffs argue that denial of their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict constituted reversible error in that plaintiffs were entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Determination of whether to grant a judgment notwithstanding the verdict is made by viewing the evidence, and all reasonable inferences therefrom, in the light most favorable to the non-movant. DeHart v. R/S Financial Corp., 78 N.C. App. 93, 337 S.E. 2d 94 (1985), cert. denied, 316 N.C. 376, 342 S.E. 2d 893 (1986). In the present case, plaintiffs claim that under…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Britt v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. ChantosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Cooley v. BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Cockrell v. Cromartie Transport Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Jacobs v. LocklearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Young v. LicaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  2. Braddy v. Nationwide Mutual Liability InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  3. Cameron v. CanadyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. Wilkerson v. WilkersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. Braddy v. Nationwide Mutual Liability InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API