Legal Opinion

Swanson v. Hill

District Court, D. North Dakota

Decided September 30, 1958No. Civ. 3415, 3416PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RONALD N. DAVIES, District Judge.

The plaintiffs, husband and wife, brought separate actions against the defendant surgeons, both of whom are specialists in their field, to recover damages for alleged malpractice said to have occurred incident to an abdominal operation performed by the defendants upon the plaintiff, Mrs. Swanson. The actions were consolidated for trial.

The defendants were employed to, and did perform a serious surgical operation on the plaintiff, Frances Swanson, on December 9, 1954, at Grand Forks, North Dakota. Testimony disclosed that the surgery was performed in a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Ramsouer v. Midland Valley R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  3. Ales v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Wilson v. Colonial Air Transport, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  5. Michener v. HuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Arneson v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Nixdorf v. HickenUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Wasem v. LaskowskiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Sagmiller v. CarlsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Froh v. Milwaukee Medical Clinic, SCCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API