Atlantic Coast Line R. v. Goldberg
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDSON, Chief Judge.
Appellee, having an unsatisfied judgment against an employee of appellant railroad company, caused a writ of garnishment to be issued, addressed to appellant, and served upon its agent in the District of Columbia. Motion was made to quash service upon the ground that appellant was not amenable to process in the District of Columbia in that it was not doing business therein. This motion was overruled and thereafter judgment was entered against appellant for an amount due by it to the judgment debtor. An application for an appeal was granted by us to review the action of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. of Texas v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Hutchinson v. Chase & Gilbert, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Frene v. Louisville Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Groesbeck v. Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- District Grocery Stores, Inc. v. Brunswick Quick Freeze Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
- Atlas Van Lines v. AustinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
- Lichtenberg v. Bullis School, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949