Legal Opinion

Sweet Water Tree Farm, Inc. v. J. Frank Schmidt & Son, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 7, 2007No. A07A1543PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ellington, Judge.

Sweet Water Tree Farm, Inc. appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to J. Frank Schmidt & Son, Inc. (“Schmidt”) in this suit on an account. Sweet Water contends that the court erred in granting summary judgment to Schmidt because material issues of fact exist regarding whether the indebtedness at issue was incurred by Sweet Water or by another corporation. For the following reasons, we reverse the court’s judgment as to part of the indebtedness and affirm the remainder of the judgment.

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kroger Co. v. U. S. Foodservice of Atlanta, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  2. Rainier Holdings, Inc. v. TatumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  3. Ambrose v. E. F. Hutton & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Concept-National, Inc. v. DIMATTINA SUPPLY COMPANY, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  5. Griffin v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Traditional Properties, Inc. v. Performance Food Group of Georgia, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  2. Choate Construction Co. v. Auto-Owners InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  3. Scott v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  4. Choate Construction Company v. Auto-Owners Ins.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API