Legal Opinion

Choate Construction Co. v. Auto-Owners Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 20, 2012No. A12A1045PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ellington, Chief Judge.

In this suit on payment and performance bonds, general contractor Choate Construction Company (“Choate”) appeals from the grant of summary judgment in favor of surety Auto-Owners Insurance Company (“AOIC”). Choate contends that the trial court erred in *683finding that, because the bonds named a principal that was a different company than the subcontractor it had hired, it could not collect on the bonds. For the following reasons, we reverse.

“Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Capital Color Printing, Inc. v. AhernCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  2. White v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  3. Hollberg v. Spalding CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. Capriulo v. Bankers Life Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  5. Growth Properties of Florida, Ltd. v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Haire v. Smith, Currie & Hancock LLPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  2. Choate Construction Company v. Auto-Owners Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  3. Choate Construction Company v. Auto-Owners Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  4. Choate Construction Company v. Auto-Owners Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  5. Manna Roof and Construction, LLC v. Jong Hyun YounCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API