Legal Opinion
Rainier Holdings, Inc. v. Tatum
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 17, 2005No. A05A1808PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBURN, Presiding Judge.
In this action seeking a writ of possession for collateral on a promissory note, Rainier Holdings, Inc. (“Rainier”), Ruby Nell Tatum, and W. L. Tatum appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Hayne Tatum and entry of default judgment as to Ruby Nell and Rainier. They contend that default was entered in error and issues of material fact preclude summary judgment. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).Ade…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Savannah Bank & Trust Co. v. WolffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Crooker v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Peachtree Plastics, Inc. v. VerhineCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Downtown Disposal Services, Inc. v. The City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 2012
- Sterling, Winchester & Long, LLC v. LoydCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- BARBOUR v. SANGHA Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- Worksiterx, LLC v. Drtango, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Sweet Water Tree Farm, Inc. v. J. Frank Schmidt & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.