Los Robles Water Co. v. Stoneman
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
This action was brought to restrain defendants from taking water from certain pipes, for a mandatory injunction compelling them to deliver water, and for damages. The demurrer of defendants to the amended complaint was sustained, and judgment entered in their favor. Plaintiff prosecutes this appeal, for the purpose of reviewing the ruling on the demurrer.
The facts alleged must, for the purposes of this decision, be deemed to be true. They are in substance.as follows: In the year 1891, Mrs. Mary O. H. Stoneman was the owner of two tracts of land in Los Angeles County, the first being…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Giselman v. StarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by7 opinions
- Illinois Central Ry. v. HicklinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Kadota Fig Ass'n of Producers v. Case-Swayne Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
- United States v. Skinner & Eddy CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1928
- Relovich v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Tandy v. WaeschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.