Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. v. City Council of Benson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 14, 1926No. 25,301PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

The relator seeks on writ of certiorari to review the proceedings of the city council in annexing territory to the municipality under G. S. 1923, § 1843. He appealed from a judgment entered pursuant to an order dismissing the writ.

Official acts that are purely legislative in their nature cannot be reviewed by certiorari. The fact that an officer dr board in the performance of duty has to ascertain certain facts and, in doing so, de-terminé what the law is, does not of itself render the acts judicial. In order to be judicial the acts must affect the rights or property of a person in a manner…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Oelschlegel v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  2. State ex rel. Childs v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  3. State ex rel. Hilton v. Village of KinneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  4. State ex rel. Hardy v. CloughSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  5. Lemont v. County of DodgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Englewood v. DailySupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
  2. State Ex Rel. Huntley School District No. 4 JT. v. SchweickhardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. State v. WalsoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  4. Clinton Falls Nursery Co. v. City of OwatonnaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API