Legal Opinion
State v. Walso
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 28, 1936No. 30,690PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Stone, Justice.
Three cases tried below as one, Avherein a property OAvner, by answers, alleged that his real estate (three parcels in Minneapolis) as assessed, in 1932, for taxation were grossly overvalued. There is no claim of discrimination. The decision below sustained the assessed valuation. Mr. Walso, the objecting owner, appeals from the order denying his alternative motion for amended findings or a new trial.
The controlling rules of our statutory and decision law need not be restated. See In re Taxes of Potlach Timber Co. 160 Minn. 209, 199 N. W. 968, and State v. Trask, 167 Minn. 304,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. WeeksSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- In re Delinquent Real Estate Taxes for 1920Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- State v. TraskSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- State Ex Rel. v. City Council of BensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- State v. Isle Harbor Land CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cooper v. HoeglundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Ostrowski v. MockridgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Clyde Allen v. W. H. O. Alfalfa Milling Co., a Colorado Corporation, Harry Spayd v. W. H. O. Alfalfa Milling Co., a Colorado CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- State v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Kalscheuer v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943