Legal Opinion

Bahakel v. City of Birmingham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 18, 1983No. 81-578PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal involves an action for an unlawful arrest. Sahid Bahakel (plaintiff), sued the City of Birmingham (city); Franklin Tate (Tate); and Marva Gibbs (Gibbs). The city and Tate moved to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12 (b)(6), Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure, contending that the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The Circuit Court for Jefferson County agreed, and dismissed plaintiff's action as to the city and Tate. It also entered final judgment under Rule 54 (b), A.R.C.P., as to those defendants. Plaintiff then appealed.

The dispositive issue is: Did the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. City of FlorenceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  2. Broom v. DouglassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. Hales v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  4. Duncan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  5. Neighbors v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Delchamps, Inc. v. BryantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  2. Franklin v. City of HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  3. Mull v. StringSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  4. Gore v. City of HooverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. Richmond v. HaneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API