Legal Opinion
Richmond v. Haney
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 6, 1992No. Civ. 910298PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.
Donald Richmond appeals from the judgment of the District Court for Burleigh County, dismissing his complaint against Thomas Haney, the City of Bismarck, and Burleigh County. We affirm.
On March 29, 1990, Richmond, acting pro se, brought this action against Thomas Haney, the City of Bismarck, and Burleigh County, alleging, among other things, a claim for malicious prosecution. An amended complaint was filed on April 10, 1990, correcting a minor drafting error on Richmond’s part. Haney and the City of Bismarck answered Richmond’s complaint on April 12, 1990, denying…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kitto v. Minot Park DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Matter of Estate of StantonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- First National Bank of Hettinger v. ClarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. MischeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Kummer v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Mertz v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. GarciaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Richmond v. NodlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Holkesvig v. WelteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.