Legal Opinion

Hales v. First Nat. Bank of Mobile

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 22, 1980No. 78-673PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action was initiated by plaintiff First National Bank of Mobile (the Bank) filing a two count complaint alleging a deficiency arising from a foreclosure sale and the right to possession of certain personal property under a security agreement. Defendants Philip and Dorothy Hales appeal from the grant of summary judgment in favor of the Bank on their amended counterclaim which alleged,inter alia, fraud, misrepresentation, and breach of fiduciary duty by the Bank. We reverse.

Issue

Whether the trial court erred to reversal in converting, suasponte, the Bank's motion to dismiss pursuant to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Georgia Southern and Florida Railway Company v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  2. Moses Davis, Jr., for Themselves Individually and as Members and Representatives of a Class of Other Persons Similarly Situated v. James HowardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. Edward H. J. Bowdidge, Geraldine Bowdidge v. John M. Lehman, District Director of ImmigrationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
  4. Benjamin Polycarpo Soley v. The Star & Herald Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Petrey v. SimonOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Graveman v. Wind Drift Owners' Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. LLOYD NOLAND FOUNDATION v. HealthSouth Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  4. Hightower and Co., Inc. v. US Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Kimbley v. City of Green RiverWyoming Supreme Court · 1982

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API