Legal Opinion
Wilkins v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided July 27, 2010No. 02A03-0910-CR-451PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAILEY, Judge.
Case Summary
In this interlocutory appeal, Damion Wilkins ("Wilkins") challenges the denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained during the execution of a search warrant. We reverse.
Issues
Wilkins presents two issues for review: 1
*657I. Whether evidence should be suppressed because the search warrant was not supported by probable cause; and
II. Whether evidence should be suppressed because the search warrant was executed as a "no-knock" warrant in violation of his constitutional rights.
Facts and Procedural History
During 2008, Fort Wayne Police began receiving tips that…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Minnesota v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Hudson v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Richards v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lacey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Lacey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Wilkins v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010