Legal Opinion

State v. Samms

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 11, 2012No. AC 33068PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLYNN, J.

The defendant, Jeffrey Samms, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of one count of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21 (a) (l)1 and two counts of stalking in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-181d (a).2 On appeal, the defendant *555claims that (1) the court improperly instructed the jury, in violation of State v. Romero, 269 Conn. 481, 849 A.2d 760 (2004), that “likely,” as used in § 53-21 (a) (1), meant “in all probability” and (2) there was insufficient evidence to sustain the jury’s guilty…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. PaduaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. State v. CalabreseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  4. State v. RomeroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  5. State v. NiemeyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. AresSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
  2. State v. GodeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  3. Kayla M. v. GreeneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  4. State v. MartoneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API