State v. Samms
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, J.
The defendant, Jeffrey Samms, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of one count of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21 (a) (l)1 and two counts of stalking in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-181d (a).2 On appeal, the defendant *555claims that (1) the court improperly instructed the jury, in violation of State v. Romero, 269 Conn. 481, 849 A.2d 760 (2004), that “likely,” as used in § 53-21 (a) (1), meant “in all probability” and (2) there was insufficient evidence to sustain the jury’s guilty…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. PaduaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. CalabreseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. RomeroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. NiemeyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. AresSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
- State v. GodeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Kayla M. v. GreeneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- State v. MartoneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015