Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Munday v. Shaw

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 4, 1936No. 1599Published

1DissentFunderburk, Justice

In the writer’s opinion this court is not warranted by the evidence in holding, as a matter of law, that Shaw met his death as the result of operations on the part of the _ City of Munday, of a strictly governmental nature, as distinguished from a proprietary or corporate nature. There are at least two reasons for this view. The act of disposing of the carcass of a dog killed in the city, by taking it to a place near the city’s sewerage disposal plant for burial, is not necessarily and primarily referable to the “sanitation for public health” of the city. It is just as reasonably to be…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. City of Galveston v. PosnainskyTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. City of Amarillo v. WareTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Texas City Transp. Co. v. WintersTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920
  4. Ostrom v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  5. City of Fort Worth v. WigginsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API