Legal Opinion

Perkins v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1853PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from the Dearborn Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

This was an indictment for receiving and concealing stolen goods. Plea, not guilty. Verdict and judgment for the state.

*223Upon the trial, the state introduced one Hite, who tes3 tilled that one Brown, one Spencer, and himself, had stolen the goods specified in the indictment; and that the defendant, knowing the goods to have been stolen, received them into his possession and assisted in concealing them. Whereupon the defendant proved by other witnesses that said Hite had stated out of Court that he had made the charge against the defendant with the hope of a pardon, and that the defendant had…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beauchamp v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1842
  2. Coffin v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1837

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hinshaw v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  3. State v. BennerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1874
  4. People v. SingerCourt Of Oyer And Terminer New York · 1886
  5. Burks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API