Legal Opinion

Leubner v. Sterner

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 10, 1992No. C5-91-2239PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge.

Appellants Georgena and Richard Leub-ner sued respondent Ronald C. Jensen, M.D., for medical malpractice. After considering the Leubners’ offer of proof of expert medical testimony, the trial court entered summary judgment, finding as a matter of law that the offered testimony stated neither a probable death nor a probability of causation. The Leubners appeal, arguing that liability can be imposed under the loss of chance theory for a decreased likelihood of survival. They also contend that aggravation of pre-existing disease and loss of consortium remain at issue. We…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Evers v. DollingerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. Herskovits v. Group Health CooperativeWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Reinhardt v. ColtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fabio v. BellomoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Leubner v. SternerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Haile v. SutherlandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  4. Dickhoff ex rel. Dickhoff v. GreenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API