Legal Opinion

Rousso v. Elco Towel Cabinet Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 25, 1928PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK J. COLEMAN, District Judge.

The patent in suit is on the design of a towel cabinet. It expired a few days after the action was commenced, and plaintiff does not now seek an injunction, but damages and an accounting of defendant’s profits. Defendant denies the validity of the patent, denies the infringement, and sets up a defense of laches on plaintiff’s part in the bringing of the action.

Plaintiff obtained, not only the design patent, but also a mechanical patent on the cabinet. In an action brought by this plaintiff in the district of Minnesota against other persons unconnected with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boyle v. RoussoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  2. Rousso v. BoyleDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Textile Mach. Works v. Louis Hirsch Textile Machines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API