Legal Opinion
Boyle v. Rousso
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 30, 1926No. 7289PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALTER H. SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
By this appeal the defendants below, Boyle, Robertson, and Burlingame, copartners as •the Duluth Linen Supply Company, seek the •reversal of that part of the decree whieh ■adjudges design patent No. 42,398, issued April 9, 1912, to the complainant Jacques Rousso, for a new ornamental design for a towel cabinet, valid and infringed by the defendants, and that they pay $250 damages and cease their infringement.
On January 5, 1912, Rousso filed in the Patent Office his application for this design patent, and on January 12, 1.912, his application for his mechanical…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Furrer v. FerrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Coder v. ArtsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Ashley v. Weeks-Numan Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- John K. Rains v. Cascade Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- H. C. White Co. v. Morton E. Converse & Son Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- Howard v. HoweCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
- S. Dresner & Son, Inc. v. DoppeltCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
- Contico International, Inc. v. Rubbermaid Commercial Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.