Legal Opinion
Textile Mach. Works v. Louis Hirsch Textile Machines, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 3, 1936Published
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff, manufacturer of full-fashioned hosiery knitting machines, brings this suit for infringement of claims 1, 3, 14, and 15 of patent No. 1,713,628 issued May 21, 1929, to Schletter. Defendant, the American sales representative of a German manufacturer of knitting machines, sells the latter in America and manufactures and sells in America the specific attachments charged to infringe. Defendant denies validity and infringement. The patent in suit was held valid and infringed in Textile Machine Works v. Hofmann, by Judge Avis in (D.C.) 4 F.Supp. 837, affirmed in 71…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Temco Electric Motor Co. v. Apco Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Black & Decker Mfg. Co. v. Baltimore Truck Tire Service Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.