Gee v. State
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WALTERS, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal under the Post-Conviction Procedure Act. See I.C. §§ 19-4901 to -4909. In his application for post-conviction relief, Dicky Gee alleged that he was denied effective assistance of counsel which resulted in an involuntary plea of guilty to the crime of rape. I.C. § 18-6101. Gee also contended that he was unreasonably being denied parole by the Department of Correction, and that his due process rights were violated by the district court clerk and by his attorney, whom he blamed for a delay in the disposition of an earlier pleading he had filed for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Aragon v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. BearshieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Davis v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
- Palmer v. DermittIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Thomas v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008
- Farr v. MischlerIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
- Free v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. DyeIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
- Parra v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.