Legal Opinion

AgMax, Inc. v. Countrymark Cooperative, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided May 15, 1992No. IP92-639CPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY

BARKER, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court on Agmax’s motion for a temporary restraining order. Inasmuch as Countrymark Cooperative, Incorporated (“Countrymark”) has acknowledged receipt of notice of this motion, the court will treat it as a motion for a preliminary injunction. See Government Suppliers Consol. Servs., Inc. v. Bayh, 734 F.Supp. 853, 861 (S.D.Ind.1990); Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil § 2951. Having heard evidence on this motion on May 13, 1992, and having read the briefs submitted by both parties, the court now sets forth its findings…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Roland MacHinery Company v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  4. MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  5. Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Assn., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API