AgMax, Inc. v. Countrymark Cooperative, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY
BARKER, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on Agmax’s motion for a temporary restraining order. Inasmuch as Countrymark Cooperative, Incorporated (“Countrymark”) has acknowledged receipt of notice of this motion, the court will treat it as a motion for a preliminary injunction. See Government Suppliers Consol. Servs., Inc. v. Bayh, 734 F.Supp. 853, 861 (S.D.Ind.1990); Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil § 2951. Having heard evidence on this motion on May 13, 1992, and having read the briefs submitted by both parties, the court now sets forth its findings…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Roland MacHinery Company v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Assn., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.