Legal Opinion
In Re Farr
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 8, 1974No. Crim. 22815PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THOMPSON, J.
In this petition for habeas corpus, petitioner William T. Farr seeks further review of an adjudication of contempt ordered by the Los Angeles Superior Court. The matter has previously been before us on writ of review from the contempt adjudication. In that proceeding, we affirmed the trial court’s order. (Farr v. Superior Court, 22 Cal.App.3d 60 [99 Cal.Rptr. 342].) A petition for hearing by our Supreme Court was denied March 20, 1972. The United States Supreme Court refused certiorari.
Most of the record pertinent to the petition which is now before us is recited in our…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- McNeil v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- In Re DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- In Re McKinneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Morris Simkin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- In Re Grand Jury Investigation. Appeal of Joseph Braun, WitnessCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Rosato v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Reifler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Howard A. Lambert v. State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.