Legal Opinion

Gregory Gabriel v. Alaska Electrical Pension Fund

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 6, 2014No. 12-35458PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

IKUTA, Circuit Judge:

Gregory R. Gabriel appeals the district court’s dismissal of his claims against the Alaska Electrical Pension Fund (the Fund) and other defendants under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. Because Gabriel failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact that the Fund abused its discretion in denying him benefits, or that he was entitled to “appropriate equitable relief’ under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3), we affirm the district court.

I

For over three years, the Fund paid Gabriel monthly pension benefits he had not earned.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gabriel v. Alaska Electrical Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Almont Ambulatory Surgery Center, LLC v. UnitedHealth Group, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
  3. Marty v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2014
  4. Zisk v. Gannett Co. Income Protection PlanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  5. Monper v. Boeing Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API