Legal Opinion
Transgo, Inc. v. Ajac Transmission Parts Corporation, and Fairbanks America, Inc. Fairbanks Racing Automatics and Joseph Lupo
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 20, 1990No. 89-55551PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
Appellant auto part manufacturers (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Fairbanks”) appeal the district court’s denial of their Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(5) motion to modify post-trial permanent injunctions entered against them. They allege that the injunctions restrict their freedom of commercial speech under the First Amendment and are inconsistent with Lanham Act provisions. Because we find that Fairbanks does not meet the requirements for modification of injunctions under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(5), we affirm the district court’s order.
FACTS
The parties in this case are…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Joseph Toussaint, Plaintiffs/appellees/cross-Appellants v. Daniel McCarthy Defendants/appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Pasadena City Board of Education v. SpanglerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Transgo, Inc. v. Ajac Transmission Parts Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Paccar Inc. v. Telescan Technologies, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Maraziti v. ThorpeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Albert Alto v. Kenneth SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- American Games, Inc., Intervenor-Appellant v. Trade Products, Inc., and Stuart Entertainment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Brother Records, Inc. v. JardineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.