Legal Opinion

Clark v. Snapper Power Equipment, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1986No. 84-1922PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, C. J.

Since the complaint was dismissed for failure to state a claim its allegations must be taken by us to be true. Radovich v. National Football League (1957), 352 U.S. 445, 448; State, ex rel. Alford, v. Willoughby (1979), 58 Ohio St. 2d 221, 223 [12 O.O.3d 229]; Wilson v. Riverside Hospital (1985), 18 Ohio St. 3d 8, 9. Therefore, the only issue to be decided is whether the doctrine of parental immunity is a bar to this action.

In reaching the conclusion to dismiss the suit against Alan Clark and Auto-Owners, the lower courts relied on our decision in Teramano v. Teramano (1966), 6 Ohio St. 2d…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Radovich v. National Football LeagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. State ex rel. Alford v. Willoughby Civil Service CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Teramano v. TeramanoOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Kirchner v. CrystalOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Wilson v. Riverside HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. Henderson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Egan v. National Distillers & Chemical Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Glaskox by and Through Denton v. GlaskoxMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  4. New Riegel Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Buehrer Group Architecture & Eng., Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Dayton v. State (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API