Clark v. Snapper Power Equipment, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, C. J.
Since the complaint was dismissed for failure to state a claim its allegations must be taken by us to be true. Radovich v. National Football League (1957), 352 U.S. 445, 448; State, ex rel. Alford, v. Willoughby (1979), 58 Ohio St. 2d 221, 223 [12 O.O.3d 229]; Wilson v. Riverside Hospital (1985), 18 Ohio St. 3d 8, 9. Therefore, the only issue to be decided is whether the doctrine of parental immunity is a bar to this action.
In reaching the conclusion to dismiss the suit against Alan Clark and Auto-Owners, the lower courts relied on our decision in Teramano v. Teramano (1966), 6 Ohio St. 2d…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Radovich v. National Football LeagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- State ex rel. Alford v. Willoughby Civil Service CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Teramano v. TeramanoOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- Kirchner v. CrystalOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Wilson v. Riverside HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. Henderson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- Egan v. National Distillers & Chemical Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
- Glaskox by and Through Denton v. GlaskoxMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
- New Riegel Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Buehrer Group Architecture & Eng., Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
- Dayton v. State (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.