Legal Opinion

United States v. Craig Allen Ladwig

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 27, 2005No. 04-30393PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOULD, Circuit Judge.

We consider whether a felony conviction for making a harassing telephone call under Washington state law, R.C.W. § 9.61.230(3)(b) (2002), 1 is a predicate offense under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). We hold-that it is.

I

On November 4, 2003, a federal grand jury in the Eastern District of Washington indicted Craig Allen Ladwig on two counts of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Lad-wig pled guilty to Count Two of the indictment on March 3, 2004. 2 The Presentence Report, prepared pursuant to Fed.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Isidro Moreno-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. Esparza-HerreraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. LadwigDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2016
  3. United States v. Robert VederoffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. Justin WerleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  5. United States v. Jacinto AlvarezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API