Legal Opinion
Ronwin v. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co., Inc.
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided October 29, 1992No. 8:CV92-00232PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CAMBRIDGE, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the defendants’ motion to dismiss and to strike (Filing No. 13). For the reasons set out below, this action will be dismissed, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for failure to state a claim.
The plaintiff in this action, Edward Ron-win, doing business as Index Investments, alleges (Filing No. 1) that he had sought to open a securities account with defendant Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co., Inc.; defendant John Spaustat is and was, at all times relevant, resident manager of Smith…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Charlotte Fusco and Daniel Boe v. Xerox CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Jackson Sawmill Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carlough v. Amchem Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Wold v. Dell Financial Services, L.P.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- Hollins v. Debt Relief of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2007