Legal Opinion

Espinoza v. Superior Court

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 21, 1993No. 1 CA-SA 93-0236PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GERBER, Presiding Judge.

BACKGROUND

Petitioner Raymond Espinoza (Espinoza) brings this special action challenging the trial court’s rejection of the plea agreement he reached with the Maricopa County Attorney. We take jurisdiction pursuant to Article 6, Section 9 of the Arizona Constitution and Rules 3 and 7 of the Rules of Procedure for Special Actions because the issues reflect statewide concern in the criminal justice system and are likely to recur.

The general issues presented are: 1) whether the trial court’s rejection of a plea agreement pursuant to an announced “quadrant B policy”…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. MorseArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. PrentissArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Hare v. SUPER. COURT, IN AND FOR CTY. OF PIMAArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. City Court of City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State Ex Rel. Bowers v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Espinoza v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Espinoza v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Espinoza v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API