Outterson v. Gould
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from judgment on report of referee. Action by Andrew Outterson, Jr., against G. Henry P. Gould. The complaint was dismissed on the merits, and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtMerwin, J.
The plaintiff, and those whom he by assignment represents, were, from 1881 to 1887, the owners of certain premises and water rights on Moose river, in the town of Lyonsdale. They kept and maintained thereon three dams for the purpose of accumulating and holding the water of the river for the use of a pulp, milk About three miles below, on the same river, the defendant, during that period, and for many years previous, was the owner of a sawmill, and was engaged in manufacturing lumber. In this business he was accustomed to obtain logs upon property above plaintiff’s mill, and float them down…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bullard v. Saratoga Victory Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Field v. Apple River Log Driving Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
- Sheldon v. . ShermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Witheral v. Muskegon Booming Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Buchanan v. Grand River & Greenville Log Running Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1882
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Henderson v. Doniphan Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1910